ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Development and Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model for Ovarian Cancer Histotype Classification Using Whole-Slide Imaging.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The histopathological classification of ovarian carcinoma is fundamental for patient management. While microscopic evaluation by pathologists is the current diagnostic standard, it is known to be subject to interobserver variability, which can affect consistency in treatment decisions. This study addresses this clinical need by developing and validating a deep learning-based diagnostic support tool designed to enhance the objectivity and reproducibility of this classification. In this work, we address a key challenge in computational pathology-the tendency of attention mechanisms to overfit by concentrating on limited features-by systematically evaluating a direct regularization method within multiple instance learning (MIL) models. The models were trained and validated using 10-fold cross-validation on a public training set of 538 whole-slide images and further tested on an independent public dataset for the more challenging task of molecular subtype classification. We utilized features from a foundational model pre-trained on histopathology data to represent tissue morphology. Our findings demonstrate that directly regularizing the attention mechanism with a stochastic approach provides a statistically significant improvement in accuracy and generalization, highlighting its power as a robust technique to mitigate overfitting for this clinical task. In direct contrast to the reported variability in manual assessment, our final model achieved high consistency and accuracy, with a balanced accuracy of 0.854 and a Cohen's Kappa of 0.791. The model also demonstrated strong generalization on the molecular classification task. Its attention mechanism provides visual heatmaps for pathologist review, fostering interpretability and trust. We have developed a highly accurate and generalizable artificial intelligence tool that directly addresses the challenge of interobserver variability in ovarian cancer classification. Its performance highlights the potential for artificial intelligence to serve as a decision support system, standardizing histopathological assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.