ArticleInsects2026
Multi-View Pareto Optimization for Minimal-Diagnostic-Set Identification of Disease Vectors.
Article in Insects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of disease vectors is crucial for public health, yet distinguishing morphologically similar species demands significant taxonomic expertise and data resources. This study proposes MVP-Net, an AI-driven framework designed to extract a minimal sufficient set of diagnostic anatomical views from multi-view imagery for efficient identification. The framework was evaluated on regionally collected datasets of Calyptratae (8 views) and Culicidae (11 views) from routine surveillance in Shanghai. Under all-view fusion, MVP-Net achieved Top-1 accuracies of 87.04% for Calyptratae and 100% for Culicidae. After Pareto-based view optimization, the required input was reduced to 5 views for Calyptratae and 2 views for Culicidae, lowering computational cost by 37.49% and 81.82%, respectively, while retaining comparable classification performance (86.11% for the recommended Calyptratae configuration and 100% for the recommended Culicidae configuration). These results show that MVP-Net can reduce view redundancy while preserving comparable identification performance within the current Shanghai surveillance setting, providing a practical approach for optimizing regional multi-view auxiliary identification workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.