ArticleJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Analysis of the Utilization of Voriconazole-Containing Regimens Versus Itraconazole in the Treatment of Blastomycosis.
Article in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Itraconazole is the recommended first-line antifungal agent in blastomycosis treatment. However, pharmacokinetic limitations and adverse drug events may necessitate the use of alternative antifungal agents. The primary objective of the study was to retrospectively describe a cohort of patients with blastomycosis who received voriconazole (as partial or complete therapy), for complete or partial treatment, compared to those who received itraconazole alone. Secondary objectives included rationale for voriconazole selection, treatment response, mortality, and adverse drug events. This retrospective multicenter cohort study included adult patients with proven/probable blastomycosis who received itraconazole or voriconazole. Treatment response was evaluated at one year or end of therapy, whichever came first. Mortality outcomes were assessed within 7 days of the last documented azole dose. Propensity score weighting and subgroup analysis were utilized to control confounding variables between cohorts. A total of 119 patients receiving itraconazole and 25 receiving voriconazole as complete or partial treatment were included. Voriconazole was often selected for CNS involvement or after intolerance to alternative azoles. After propensity score weighting, no significant difference in complete or partial treatment response was observed. Rates of all-cause mortality and blastomycosis-related mortality were numerically higher in the voriconazole cohort. Adverse drug event rates were similar between cohorts; however, discontinuation due to adverse events was more common in the voriconazole cohort. Voriconazole was most utilized for the treatment of blastomycosis in cases with CNS involvement or intolerance to other azoles. A statistically significant difference in response rate was not identified between voriconazole-containing or itraconazole-treated patients; however, given limited sample sizes, further data is needed to assess the equivalency of these agents in the treatment of blastomycosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.