Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42042311›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2026

4D Printing in Biomedical Implants and Functional Healthcare Devices.

Muhammad Shafiq, Liaqat Zeb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammad ShafiqSchool of Medical Sciences, Shandong Xiehe University, Jinan 250109, China.
Liaqat ZebLaboratory of Bioresources and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3657-5362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four-dimensional (4D) printing integrates additive manufacturing with stimuli-responsive materials to fabricate biomedical implants and functional healthcare devices that undergo programmed, time-dependent changes in shape or function. Unlike static 3D-printed constructs, 4D-printed systems can respond to clinically relevant stimuli such as temperature, hydration, pH, light (including near-infrared), magnetic fields, or electrical inputs. These triggers drive defined actuation mechanisms, most commonly thermomechanical shape-memory recovery, swelling-induced morphing, and magnetothermal activation. This review synthesizes the principal material platforms used for biomedical 4D printing, including shape-memory polymers and alloys, hydrogels, liquid-crystal elastomers, and responsive composites, and links material choice to device behavior and translational feasibility. Applications are discussed across self-expanding stents, cardiac occluders, tissue-engineered constructs, implantable drug delivery systems, and adaptive wearables. Key translational challenges include sterilization compatibility, manufacturing reproducibility and quality control, safe stimulus delivery, predictable biodegradation and long-term biocompatibility, and regulatory pathway definition.

Indexed as

4D printingbiomedicals implantsdrug delivery systems

Identifiers

PMID42042311
PMCPMC13117948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.