Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42042275›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026

Physicochemical Characterization of a Strontium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer Compared with Two Conventional Sealers.

Loai Alsofi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Loai AlsofiDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80209, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0430-0268

Funding

the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, IPP: 28-165-2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the physicochemical properties of a novel strontium silicate-based root canal sealer (C-Root SP) in comparison with a calcium silicate-based sealer (TotalFill BC) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus).

methodsSetting time, net mass change (apparent solubility behavior), pH changes, and surface characteristics were assessed based on ISO 6876 and ANSI/ADA Specification No. 57, with minor methodological modifications. Net mass change and pH were evaluated over 28 days. Surface morphology and elemental composition were analyzed after dry and aqueous aging in deionized water using scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Data were analyzed using one-way and repeated-measures ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05).

resultsAH Plus exhibited the longest initial and final setting times (10.93 ± 0.65 h and 37.33 ± 0.13 h), whereas TotalFill BC showed the shortest (7.98 ± 0.32 h and 30.18 ± 0.20 h); C-Root SP demonstrated intermediate values (9.35 ± 0.38 h and 32.75 ± 0.57 h) (

conclusionsC-Root SP exhibited physicochemical behavior consistent with a strontium-modified calcium silicate-based sealer, characterized by hydration-driven hydroxyl ion release resulting in apparent alkalinity and ion exchange-associated behavior, and dynamic surface changes consistent with those reported for bioceramic materials. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Strontium incorporation may influence hydration-mediated physicochemical behavior; however, further in vitro and in vivo studies are required to determine its clinical relevance.

Indexed as

calcium silicateendodontic sealersnet mass change (apparent solubility behavior)root canal obturationscanning electron microscopystrontium

Identifiers

PMID42042275
PMCPMC13116927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.