ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Thermal Conductivity in Nanoporous Aerogels: A Critical Review of Gas and Solid Conduction Models and Structure-Property Relations.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Pre-Vulcanization Time on Structure and Thermal Insulation of Natural Rubber Latex/Silica Aerogel Composites.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of Medium Radiation on Thermal Conductivity Measurement of Aerogels Using Steady-State Heating Method.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sol-gel processing provides an unusually controllable route to nanoporous solids, making silica aerogels the leading reference systems for extremely low thermal conductivity due to their high porosity, nanoscale pore sizes, and tunable solid frameworks. Under near-ambient conditions, thermal transport is multi-scale and multiphase, arising primarily from coupled solid conduction through the skeletal network and gas conduction within the pore space. Accordingly, aerogel design has emphasized suppressing solid-phase transport by reducing network connectivity, increasing tortuosity, and enhancing boundary scattering, while also limiting gaseous conduction through the control of pore size and gas pressure. This critical review provides an integrated overview of these mechanisms and the theory-to-experiment toolbox used to quantify the separate and combined contributions of the solid and gas phases to the effective thermal conductivity. We link key structural and environmental parameters (porosity, pore size distribution, density, backbone morphology, and pressure) to dominant transport regimes and the assumptions embedded in common models. Classical approaches, including effective-medium and percolation-based models, are assessed alongside phonon-scaling descriptions that incorporate characteristic length scales. Particular attention is given to the Knudsen effect and pressure-sensitive gas-conduction models, which are central to interpreting performance at atmospheric conditions and under vacuum or low-pressure operation. This review highlights inconsistencies across datasets and modeling practices, identifies persistent knowledge gaps, and outlines practical directions toward processable structure-property guidelines for manufacturing aerogels with targeted thermal performance, with regard to conduction-dominated heat transport mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.