ReviewGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Need for Standardized Data Collection to Improve Harmonization and Pooling of Information About Modifiable Risk Factors for Alzheimer's Diseases in Italian Clinical Studies: A Systematic Review.
Review in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAt the international level, harmonized networks of dementia clinical studies are available, but Italian participation remains limited. This systematic review aims to define harmonization rules to facilitate the inclusion of Italian clinical studies in existing networks and to propose standardized data collection methods to enable comparison of the study results.
methodsA systematic review was conducted (January 2019-December 2024) to identify Italian clinical studies evaluating Alzheimer's disease and other dementias as outcomes. Eight modifiable risk factors were extracted: BMI, arterial hypertension, diabetes, dietary patterns, alcohol consumption, smoking habits, depressive symptomatology, and physical activity. WHO definitions and internationally accepted criteria were used as reference standards. Variable harmonization potential was assessed using the DataSHaPER methodology and classified as complete, partial, or impossible, considering information loss across studies.
resultsOf 365 records identified, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. Obesity assessed via BMI showed the highest harmonization potential (44% complete, 33% partial), along with dietary habits measured by food frequency questionnaires (44% complete). Diabetes and physical inactivity followed (33% complete), assessed through fasting glucose or pharmacological treatment and the IPAQ, respectively. Smoking habits classified as current, former, or never smokers were reported in 28% of studies. Depression (assessed by GDS or CES-D) and hypertension (blood pressure measurement or antihypertensive treatment) showed complete harmonization in only 22% of studies.
conclusionsItalian studies show substantial limitations in the harmonization of modifiable risk factor data for Alzheimer's disease, mainly due to heterogeneous and non-standardized data collection methods, highlighting the need for uniform research protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.