ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2026
Omics-Derived Prognostic Biomarkers in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review with Risk-of-Bias Appraisal and Translational Prioritization.
Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) is clinically heterogeneous, and patients with a similar TNM stage can experience markedly different outcomes. We systematically reviewed omics-driven studies to identify prognostic TSCC biomarkers. Although fundamentally prognostic, we discussed their theoretical translational relevance regarding future clinical decisions-such as treatment stratification or surveillance intensity-while strictly framing them as preliminary, hypothesis-generating targets. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched for original human studies published between 2014 and 2024 using high-throughput genomic or transcriptomic profiling. Study selection followed referred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), data were extracted with a structured workbook, and risk of bias was assessed using QUIPS and PROBAST, with reporting completeness appraised using REMARK. Seventeen studies were included, identifying 85 distinct biomarkers. Across biomarkers supported by multivariable overall survival analyses, higher-risk associations were reported for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.