ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2026
Methodological Landscape of DNA Damage Response Detection: From Conventional Assays to Future Innovations.
Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TheCancer management and research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
All living organisms possess a DNA damage response (DDR) that is important for genetic evolution. Cells have developed comprehensive mechanisms for addressing DNA damage, collectively called the DNA damage response and repair. External environmental stress continuously disrupts genomic integrity and triggers various pathological changes. The failure of the DDR network often drives cell carcinogenesis, and its core components not only serve as biological markers for disease monitoring but also represent highly promising molecular targets for targeted therapy. Therefore, there is a high level of interest in exploring DDR-related biomarkers as cutting-edge therapeutic regimens and developing highly sensitive tools for DDR diagnosis. These methods should assess the rate of damage occurrence and distinguish when repair pathways are activated. These kinds of advances are key to preserving genetic stability and detecting and preventing diseases early. Here, we provide a broad summary of recent advances in DDR detection technologies, with a particular focus on the complementarity between different techniques. We have also summarized current technological bottlenecks, future research paradigms, and clinical translation pathways. The insights presented in this review will contribute to the development of multidisciplinary integrated DDR detection technologies, promote the establishment of DDR biomarker detection systems, and provide crucial methodological references for targeted drug development, efficacy evaluation, and resistance mechanism research targeting the DDR pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.