ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Acute Aortic Dissection in Women: A Comprehensive Review of Sex-Specific Differences, Clinical Management, and Outcomes.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postpartum Aortic Dissection Without Aortic Dilation in a Woman With an ACTA2 Gene Mutation.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency characterized by important sex-related differences in presentation, management, and outcomes. Although women account for a smaller proportion of cases, they typically present at older ages and more frequently exhibit atypical symptoms, hemodynamic instability, and complications such as pericardial effusion or tamponade, contributing to diagnostic delays and higher pre-hospital mortality. Beyond clinical factors, biological differences may influence disease expression in women. Menopause-associated vascular aging, hormonal modulation of extracellular matrix remodeling, and pregnancy-related hemodynamic and connective tissue changes may alter aortic wall integrity and susceptibility to dissection. Notably, women often experience dissection at smaller absolute aortic diameters, highlighting the potential importance of body-size indexing in risk stratification and surgical thresholds. In type A AAD, women are less likely to undergo extensive surgical repair in some cohorts, and although contemporary in-hospital mortality differences are narrowing, long-term survival disparities may persist. In type B AAD, women are more frequently managed conservatively, while outcomes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair appear broadly comparable between sexes. Pregnancy and the postpartum period represent particularly vulnerable windows, especially among patients with underlying heritable aortopathies. Greater awareness of sex-specific biological and clinical characteristics, incorporation of indexed aortic dimensions, and improved multidisciplinary management strategies are essential to optimize outcomes for women with acute aortic dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.