ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
State-of-the-Art Definitive Femoropopliteal Lesion Treatment: A Case-Based Systematic Approach.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After vessel preparation, using different strategies such as balloon angioplasty, specialty balloons, atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy, definitive treatment has emerged as a key feature in endovascular treatment strategies. Based on current guidelines, endovascular treatment is the most common treatment option in patients with claudication. In patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), on the other hand, the best treatment modality, including bypass surgery and endovascular revascularization, needs to be selected by an interdisciplinary team, focusing on individual anatomic and patient-specific characteristics, on the availability of a vein graft and on cardiovascular and other comorbidities of the patients. With endovascular therapy, currently, a plethora of options are available for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions, which are increasingly gaining in complexity. Therefore, a practical systematic case-based approach, entailing contemporary treatment options, like drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty tools, self-expanding bare-metal stents (BMSs), drug-eluting stents (DESs), interwoven stents and covered stents, is crucial. Generally, most endovascular operators adhere to the 'leave nothing behind' concept, meaning that, after proper lesion preparation, lesions can be treated with DCBs, avoiding the implantation of permanent metallic implants. However, in the case of severe dissections or significant recoil, stent implantation becomes necessary to achieve adequate limb perfusion. The selection between long versus spot stenting and the different stent options depends on the current scientific evidence, guidelines and expert opinion statements. An interdisciplinary expert consensus was recently compiled on how these modalities should be used in specific lesions and patients in the femoropopliteal segment. Herein we present a practical case-based approach, which is based on this algorithm and aims at harmonization of endovascular treatment strategies in daily practice and ultimately at further improvements in limb and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.