ArticleBiology2026
PSMC-FAC: Automated Optimization of False-Negative Rate Corrections for Low-Coverage PSMC-Based Demographic Inference.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inferring demographic history from whole-genome data is a central objective in evolutionary and conservation genomics. However, the Pairwise Sequentially Markovian Coalescent (PSMC) framework, one of the most widely used demographic inference methods for whole-genome sequence data, is highly sensitive to sequencing coverage, with low coverage producing systematic underestimation of heterozygosity, which biases effective population size trajectories. Here, we present PSMC-FAC, an automated method designed to optimize false-negative rate correction in low-coverage genomes by minimizing geometric distances between FNR-corrected low-coverage trajectories and their corresponding high-coverage references. Whole-genome datasets from humans, gray wolves, and cattle were downsampled across multiple coverage levels and processed through standard demographic inference pipelines. Corrected trajectories, projected onto a common temporal grid, were compared using Hausdorff and discrete Fréchet distance metrics and optimal correction factors were modeled as a function of sequencing depth using second-degree polynomial regression. Across species and demographic contexts, PSMC-FAC substantially improved concordance between low- and high-coverage trajectories and revealed highly predictable coverage-dependent correction patterns. Overall, PSMC-FAC provides a reproducible and mathematically grounded alternative to subjective correction approaches, enabling reliable demographic inference from moderate-coverage genomes and facilitating broader population-scale genomic analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.