ReviewBiology2026
Pitch at the Cocktail Party: A Comparative Approach to Studying Selective Attention.
Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pitch is a powerful cue for segregating sound sources in complex acoustic scenes, yet the neural mechanisms through which it guides selective attention remain unclear. In this review, we consider behavioural and neurophysiological evidence from humans and animal models to examine how pitch supports selective listening in a two-stage process: bottom-up pitch-based feature binding, followed by top-down enhancement of an attended sound source. Behavioural studies demonstrate that even modest pitch differences substantially improve listeners' segregation of harmonic sounds, tone streams, and competing talkers. Human EEG, MEG, fMRI and ECoG studies show enhancement of target sound representations in auditory cortex during selective listening, but understanding this process at the level of individual neurons requires further study in animals that are trained in pitch-based selective listening tasks. Other key questions in this field include the relative roles of resolved and unresolved harmonic cues, the neural circuit mechanisms underlying target enhancement versus masker suppression, and how attention can target distributed cortical pitch representations. We argue that cross-species, naturalistic paradigms are essential for answering these questions and for addressing the listening difficulties associated with ageing and hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.