Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041830›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2026

Event-Based Vision at the Edge: A Review.

Michael Middleton, Teymoor Ali, Epifanios Baikas, Hakan Kayan, Basabdatta Sen Bhattacharya, Elena Gheorghiu, Mark Vousden, Charith Perera, Oliver Rhodes, Martin A Trefzer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael MiddletonDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0862-7524
Teymoor AliFaculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1576-6645
Epifanios BaikasSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-0376-7636
Hakan KayanSchool of Computer Science and Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4878-2326
Basabdatta Sen BhattacharyaSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5079-0619
Elena GheorghiuFaculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9459-1969
Mark VousdenSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6552-5831
Charith PereraSchool of Computer Science and Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0190-3346
Oliver RhodesSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1728-2828
Martin A TrefzerDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6196-6832

Funding

EPSRC EP/Y030133/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) executed on neuromorphic hardware promise energyefficient, low-latency inference well-suited to edge deployment in size, weight, and powerconstrained environments such as autonomous vehicles, wearable devices, and unmanned aerial platforms. However, a coherent research pathway to deployment of neuromorphic devices remains elusive. This paper presents a structured review and position on the state of SNN-based vision across four interconnected dimensions: network architectures, training methodologies, event-based datasets and simulation techniques, and neuromorphic computing hardware. We survey the evolution from shallow convolutional SNNs to spiking Transformers and hybrid designs which leverage the advantages of SNNs and conventional artificial neural networks. We also examine surrogate gradient training and ANN-to-SNN conversion approaches, catalogue real-world and simulated event-based datasets, and assess the landscape of neuromorphic platforms ranging from rigid mixed-signal architectures to fully-configurable digital systems. Our analysis reveals that while each area has matured considerably in isolation, critical integration challenges persist. In particular, event-based datasets remain scarce and lack standardisation, training methodologies introduce systematic gaps relative to deployment hardware, and access to neuromorphic platforms is restricted by proprietary toolchains and limited development kit availability. We conclude that bridging these integration gaps, rather than advancing individual components alone, represents the most important and least addressed work required to realise the potential of SNN-based vision at the edge.

Indexed as

neuromorphic computingneuromorphic hardwarespiking neural networks

Identifiers

PMID42041830
PMCPMC13115445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.