ArticleBrain sciences2026
Neurobehavioral Predictors of Fibromyalgia: Internal Validation of a Model Based on Psychological Distress and Affective Regulation.
Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesFibromyalgia is increasingly viewed as a disorder of central sensitization, involving altered nociceptive processing and dysregulated stress and affective neural systems. Evidence supports shared neurobiological mechanisms linking chronic pain, emotional distress, and affect regulation, including corticolimbic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis alterations. However, predictive models evaluating psychological distress as markers of these brain-based processes remain scarce. This study aimed to internally validate a preliminary model of fibromyalgia diagnosis using self-reported distress indicators as proxies of central dysregulation.
methodsA case-control design study with 180 participants was performed. Medically diagnosed fibromyalgia cases were recruited via a pain facility or referrals, alongside geographically matched controls from the general population. Psychological variables were conceptualized as neurobehavioral indicators reflecting central sensitization and stress-system dysregulation. Predictors were selected using LASSO penalized regression with 10-fold cross-validation. Retained variables were re-estimated using logistic regression. Model performance was evaluated through Nagelkerke's pseudo-R2, a likelihood ratio test, and area under the curve (AUC). Internal validation was conducted via 1000-bootstrap resampling with calibration-slope-based shrinkage.
resultsThe final model included global psychological distress, positive affect, sex, and age (R2=0.359, with good discrimination [AUC = 0.81; optimism-corrected AUC ≈ 0.79]). Higher distress and age were associated with increased odds of fibromyalgia.
conclusionsSelf-reported psychological distress, particularly global distress and reduced positive affect, combined with sex and age, showed internal validity in predicting fibromyalgia diagnosis. These findings support the hypothesis that behavioral markers of emotional dysregulation may reflect underlying central sensitization and stress-system alterations implicated in chronic pain. Future research integrating psychological measures with neuroimaging and neuroendocrine markers may further clarify the neural mechanisms linking affective dysregulation and chronic pain vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.