ReviewBrain sciences2026
Targeting Sigma-1 and Sigma-2 Receptors in Neuropathic Pain: Pharmacology, Ligand Development, and Translational Progress.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeuropathic pain remains a major unmet clinical challenge. Growing evidence identifies sigma receptors (σRs) as pivotal intracellular modulators of maladaptive stress signaling, positioning them as promising non-opioid targets for chronic pain management. Notably, despite the pleiotropic nature of σRs in regulating diverse cellular pathways-which might theoretically suggest a high risk of off-target effects-current selective antagonists have demonstrated remarkable safety and tolerability profiles. Sigma-1 and sigma-2 receptors (σ1R and σ2R) are molecularly and functionally distinct proteins that regulate neuronal excitability, proteostasis, and neuroimmune communication, all mechanisms that characterize neuronal excitability and cellular stress adaptation. σ1R acts as a ligand-operated molecular chaperone at the mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Extensive preclinical data demonstrate that σ1R antagonism attenuates peripheral and central sensitization, suppresses neuroinflammation, and restores opioid analgesic efficacy. These findings are supported by the advanced clinical candidate E-52862, which has shown efficacy and a favorable safety profile in neuropathic pain conditions. σ2R, identified as transmembrane protein 97 (σ2R/TMEM97), functions as a regulator of cholesterol trafficking, lysosomal integrity, and integrated stress response (ISR). σ2R modulation alleviates neuropathic pain by restoring proteostatic balance and reducing ISR-driven neuronal vulnerability rather than directly suppressing excitability. Emerging σ2R ligands such as FEM-1689, UKH-1114, and CM-398 provide compelling proof-of-concept for durable, disease-modifying analgesia.
methodsA structured literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies published within the last decade describing σ1R and σ2R/TMEM97 biology, ligand development, and their preclinical or clinical evaluation in neuropathic pain. Reference lists were manually screened to ensure comprehensive coverage.
conclusionsThis review synthesizes pharmacology, ligand development, and translational evidence supporting σRs as next-generation targets for neuropathic pain therapy, highlighting convergent roles of σ1R and σ2R in pain chronification and outlining future directions for structure-guided therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.