Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041761›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2026

Self-Learning Multimodal Emotion Recognition Based on Multi-Scale Dilated Attention.

Xiuli Du, Luyao Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiuli DuSchool of Information Engineering, Dalian University, Dalian 116622, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9963-3160
Luyao ZhuSchool of Information Engineering, Dalian University, Dalian 116622, China.

Funding

Liaoning Provincial Education Department JYTMS20230377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesEmotions can be recognized through external behavioral cues and internal physiological signals. Owing to the inherently complex psychological and physiological nature of emotions, models relying on a single modality often suffer from limited robustness. This study aims to improve emotion recognition performance by effectively integrating electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and facial expressions through a multimodal framework.

methodsWe propose a multimodal emotion recognition model that employs a Multi-Scale Dilated Attention Convolution (MSDAC) network tailored for facial expression recognition, integrates an EEG emotion recognition method based on three-dimensional features, and adopts a self-learning decision-level fusion strategy. MSDAC incorporates Multi-Scale Dilated Convolutions and a Dual-Branch Attention (D-BA) module to capture discontinuous facial action units. For EEG processing, raw signals are converted into a multidimensional time-frequency-spatial representation to preserve temporal, spectral, and spatial information. To overcome the limitations of traditional stitching or fixed-weight fusion approaches, a self-learning weight fusion mechanism is introduced at the decision level to adaptively adjust modality contributions.

resultsThe facial analysis branch achieved average accuracies of 74.1% on FER2013, 99.69% on CK+, and 98.05% (valence)/96.15% (arousal) on DEAP. On the DEAP dataset, the complete multimodal model reached 98.66% accuracy for valence and 97.49% for arousal classification.

conclusionsThe proposed framework enhances emotion recognition by improving facial feature extraction and enabling adaptive multimodal fusion, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining EEG and facial information for robust emotion analysis.

Indexed as

action unitsdecision-level fusiondifferential entropyEEGemotion recognitionfacial expressionsmultimodalmulti-scale dilated convolution

Identifiers

PMID42041761
PMCPMC13115363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.