ReviewBrain sciences2026
Neuroradiological Insights into Visual Mental Imagery: Structural and Functional Imaging of Ventral and Dorsal Streams.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual mental imagery, the ability to generate and manipulate internal visual experiences without direct sensory input, links perception with memory, planning, and higher cognition. In this targeted narrative review, we synthesize neuroimaging and lesion evidence on the brain basis of visual imagery, with a focus on neuroradiological correlates of the ventral and dorsal visual pathways. Unlike prior cognitive neuroscience reviews that primarily emphasize functional mechanisms, this review is neuroradiology-oriented and integrates lesion patterns and white-matter disconnection to support clinico-radiological interpretation of imagery complaints. Using a dual-stream framework, we contrast ventral occipito-temporal systems that preferentially support object imagery (appearance-based features such as form, faces/objects, and color, with texture remaining under-studied) with dorsal occipito-parietal systems that preferentially support spatial imagery (relations, transformations, and navigation). Across studies, imagery recruitment is strongly task- and stage-dependent: ventral regions are most often engaged during object-focused imagery, whereas parietal regions are prominent during spatial transformation tasks, with evidence for interaction between pathways when demands require both content and spatial operations. Structural and clinico-radiological findings indicate that imagery impairment can arise from focal posterior lesions and posterior neurodegenerative syndromes but also from network disruption affecting long-range connections that support top-down access to posterior representations. Finally, emerging work on aphantasia and hyperphantasia supports a network-level view in which imagery vividness relates to how effectively higher-order systems engage visual representations. We conclude that standardized, stream-sensitive tasks and multimodal approaches combining functional and structural imaging with lesion-based evidence are key to discovering clinically actionable biomarkers of imagery dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.