ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Outcome Measures to Assess the Effectiveness of Exercise Interventions on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): A Scoping Review.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the efficacy of duloxetine and venlafaxine in chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in cancer patients: a double-blind multicenter randomized clinical trial.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of neurotoxic chemotherapy that can affect functioning and quality of life. Currently, duloxetine is the only recommended agent to treat painful CIPN; however, no effective pharmacological treatments have been approved for the prevention or cure of CIPN, highlighting the need to understand non-pharmacological strategies such as exercise. Given significant heterogeneity in the CIPN outcome measures chosen across studies, this scoping review aimed to identify the outcome measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise interventions as a potential countermeasure for CIPN. Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework refined by Levac and colleagues, and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, four databases were searched, and 20 studies were included in the review. Data were abstracted on study characteristics, cancer and chemotherapy factors, exercise prescription, outcome measures, and CIPN-related findings. Outcome measures varied widely across studies, encompassing various patient-reported, clinical, and functional measures. The most common patient-reported, clinical, and functional measures were the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20, vibration sensation, and maximal isometric strength, respectively. No study satisfied the components of the core outcome measure set proposed by Park and colleagues, limiting cross-study comparisons. These findings underscore the need for standardized CIPN outcome measures in future exercise studies to strengthen evidence synthesis and inform clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.