ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Regression of a Non-Irradiated Lung Adenocarcinoma During Glioblastoma-Directed Chemoradiotherapy: A Case Report.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment-associated regression of tumors outside the irradiated field has occasionally been reported, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, particularly in the context of central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy. Glioblastoma (GBM) is commonly treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide, both of which may influence tumor biology and the systemic environment. We report a patient with synchronous primary GBM and early-stage lung adenocarcinoma who underwent craniotomy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide for GBM. During GBM-directed chemoradiotherapy, the untreated pulmonary lesion demonstrated progressive regression without any lung-specific therapy, temporally coinciding with CNS-targeted treatment. Although comprehensive immunophenotyping was not feasible, longitudinal changes in the proportion of peripheral blood lymphocytes were observed during therapy. These findings represent a clinical observation characterized by a temporal association between CNS-directed treatment and regression of a distant, non-irradiated tumor. However, the underlying mechanism remains uncertain, and a contribution from systemic temozolomide exposure cannot be excluded. While treatment-related systemic effects may be considered, no specific causal mechanism can be established based on this single case. This case highlights an unusual clinical observation that may warrant further investigation. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between CNS-directed therapies and systemic tumor behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.