ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Fertility Preservation Needs of Men Undergoing Cancer Treatment: An Explorative Qualitative Study.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Men undergoing cancer therapy are at risk of treatment-related infertility, which can negatively affect quality of life. Although fertility preservation (FP) is routinely recommended for men of reproductive age who are diagnosed with cancer, less is known about how they navigate these decisions or what informational and emotional supports they require across the diagnosis-treatment-survivorship trajectory. We conducted a qualitative secondary analysis of a subset of data from a broader study of cancer and FP decision-making. In-depth interviews with 12 men who had undergone fertility-threatening cancer treatments and had experienced FP were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Participants reported gaps in clear, timely and practical information, including costs, clinic access, sperm storage and future use. Men and their partners described feelings of fear, uncertainty and diminished control, especially when decisions had to be made quickly, before treatment began. Their choices were influenced not only by clinical advice but also by social expectations related to masculinity. Structural/logistical barriers such as diagnostic uncertainty, illness severity and poorly coordinated care pathways further undermined their agency and contributed to distress. These findings indicate that men's experience of FP is not a straightforward medical procedure but a complex and ongoing process with logistical, informational and psychosocial challenges. Integrating organized counselling and continuous emotional support into oncology care may reduce distress and enhance decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.