ArticleCells2026
Combined CDK4/6 Inhibition and Radiation: Effects on Cellular Senescence, Cell Cycle Regulation, and Cell Death in Mammary Carcinoma Cells.
Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib are commonly used in the clinical treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer. Patients with metastatic disease often receive palliative radiotherapy for symptom control of bone metastases and/or local lesions, typically administered in close temporal proximity to CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy, although treatment with the inhibitors may be temporarily paused during the radiotherapy period in some cases. In this study, we investigated the extent to which senescence is induced by CDK4/6 inhibitors, ionizing radiation, and the combination of the two, compared to other types of cell fate. Eight breast cancer cell lines with different molecular subtypes and two healthy cell lines (fibroblasts and keratinocytes) were treated with CDK inhibition using palbociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib and with or without a single dose of 2 Gy ionizing radiation. Cellular senescence, cell death in form of apoptosis and necrosis, and the cell cycle were analyzed using flow cytometry. We focused mainly on understanding how CDK inhibition can trigger cellular senescence. Our data showed that in many cell lines -but not all-the use of CDK inhibitors induced senescence much more strongly than cell death. Except for one cell line, significantly more cell lines died necrotically than apoptotically. Neither apoptosis nor necrosis was responsible for a major cell fate after CDK inhibition. Combination therapy with irradiation did not show a clear additive effect. In cell lines, senescence is clearly triggered by CDK4/6 inhibitors and even more so when in combination with ionizing radiation, which, when transferred to patients, could lead to less damage caused by cell loss, such as necrotic areas. However, it could also lead to more senescence-specific side effects, such as inflammation-induced tumors and fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.