Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041568›Full record

ReviewCells2026

Integrative Computational Approaches to Prostate Cancer with Conditional Reprogramming and AI-Driven Precision Medicine.

Ahmed Fadiel, Punit Malpani, Kenneth D Eichenbaum, Frederick Naftolin, Aya Hassouneh, Geralyn Chong, Kunle Odunsi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed FadielComputational Oncology Unit, The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Punit MalpaniComputational Oncology Unit, The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-0393-5361
Kenneth D EichenbaumDepartment of Anesthesiology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI 48309, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9634-8295
Frederick Naftoline-Bio Corporation, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Aya HassounehDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western Michigan University, 1903 W. Michigan Ave, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4617-4535
Geralyn ChongComputational Oncology Unit, The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-1390-7247
Kunle OdunsiUniversity of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 5481 South Maryland Avenue, MC1140, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer, particularly metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), presents therapeutic challenges rooted in adaptive lineage plasticity and neuroendocrine transdifferentiation. Conventional genome-based models fail to account for the divergent clinical trajectories observed among tumors that share identical driver mutations. This limitation requires reconceptualizing cancer as a dynamic system in which tumor cells can execute context-dependent molecular programs governed by epigenetic and transcriptional network remodeling. This review critically evaluates three convergent technological pillars reshaping prostate cancer research and clinical care. First, conditional reprogramming (CR) enables the rapid generation of patient-derived models that preserve genomic fidelity, intratumoral heterogeneity, and reversible phenotypic plasticity without genetic manipulation. Second, single-cell and spatial multi-omics approaches have clarified the cellular trajectories underlying luminal-to-neuroendocrine transdifferentiation, identifying a therapeutically actionable intermediate state. They have revealed the hierarchical transcription factor network (FOXA2-NKX2-1-p300/CBP) which orchestrates chromatin remodeling during this lethal transition. Third, physics-informed machine learning and digital twin architectures aim to move beyond correlative risk prediction toward mechanistically sound forecasting of tumor evolution, treatment response, and resistance emergence. We address unresolved challenges in prospective clinical validation, spatial heterogeneity capture, regulatory pathways for functional diagnostics, and the imperative for causal, as opposed to associative, inference from perturbational datasets. The integration of these three domains through closed-loop experimental-computational feedback cycles represents a paradigm shift from reactive to anticipatory precision oncology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCellular ReprogrammingComputational BiologyPrecision MedicineProstatic NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansMachine LearningMaleconditional reprogrammingdigital twinsFOXA2–NKX2-1lineage plasticityneuroendocrine transdifferentiationphysics-informed machine learningprecision oncologyprostate cancersingle-cell multi-omicsspatial transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42041568
PMCPMC13114512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.