ReviewCells2026
Integrative Computational Approaches to Prostate Cancer with Conditional Reprogramming and AI-Driven Precision Medicine.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer, particularly metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), presents therapeutic challenges rooted in adaptive lineage plasticity and neuroendocrine transdifferentiation. Conventional genome-based models fail to account for the divergent clinical trajectories observed among tumors that share identical driver mutations. This limitation requires reconceptualizing cancer as a dynamic system in which tumor cells can execute context-dependent molecular programs governed by epigenetic and transcriptional network remodeling. This review critically evaluates three convergent technological pillars reshaping prostate cancer research and clinical care. First, conditional reprogramming (CR) enables the rapid generation of patient-derived models that preserve genomic fidelity, intratumoral heterogeneity, and reversible phenotypic plasticity without genetic manipulation. Second, single-cell and spatial multi-omics approaches have clarified the cellular trajectories underlying luminal-to-neuroendocrine transdifferentiation, identifying a therapeutically actionable intermediate state. They have revealed the hierarchical transcription factor network (FOXA2-NKX2-1-p300/CBP) which orchestrates chromatin remodeling during this lethal transition. Third, physics-informed machine learning and digital twin architectures aim to move beyond correlative risk prediction toward mechanistically sound forecasting of tumor evolution, treatment response, and resistance emergence. We address unresolved challenges in prospective clinical validation, spatial heterogeneity capture, regulatory pathways for functional diagnostics, and the imperative for causal, as opposed to associative, inference from perturbational datasets. The integration of these three domains through closed-loop experimental-computational feedback cycles represents a paradigm shift from reactive to anticipatory precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.