ReviewCells2026
Plant Vacuolar and Human Endolysosomal Two-Pore Channels: Similarities and Differences.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two-pore channels (TPCs) are evolutionarily conserved intracellular cation channels found in both plants and animals, where they mediate ion fluxes across endomembrane compartments. While historically the plant channel was among the first plant ion channels to be characterized, thanks to the relative ease of applying the patch-clamp technique to isolated plant vacuoles, where it is localized, the functional properties of the two main human isoforms, HsTPC1 and HsTPC2, expressed in endosomal and lysosomal membranes, were elucidated much later. In plants, TPCs are typically represented by a single isoform, exemplified by AtTPC1 in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, which functions as a voltage-dependent, Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.