ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Pigeon-Inspired Depth-Reasoning-Driven Decision Framework for Autonomous Traversal Flight of Quadrotors in Unmapped 3D Spaces.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autonomous traversal flight in unknown 3D environments remains challenging due to mapping bottlenecks and computational latency. Inspired by pigeons navigating cluttered forests through instantaneous visual perception rather than constructing global metric maps, this paper presents a pigeon-inspired depth-reasoning-driven decision framework for agile quadrotor traversal in unmapped spaces without explicit map construction. To ensure feasibility, we leverage a robust state estimation backbone enhanced by deep-learning-based feature matching, providing stable pose feedback under aggressive maneuvers. The core contribution is a pigeon-inspired depth-reasoning framework that translates raw sensory depth data into a hybrid optimization framework, integrating both hard safety constraints and soft geometric smoothness constraints, directly emulating the three avian mechanisms: gap selection via instantaneous depth gradients, path selection that minimizes posture changes, and a safety field driven by the looming effect. By bypassing time-consuming mapping and spatial discretization processes, the framework significantly reduces perception-to-control latency. Finally, validated via simulations and real-world experiments on a resource-constrained quadrotor platform, our map-less approach achieves superior decision frequencies and comparable safety margins to those of state-of-the-art map-based planners. This framework offers a practical, high-frequency solution for autonomous flight where computational resources and environmental knowledge are strictly limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.