Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041500›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

An Improved Genghis Khan Shark Optimization Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems.

Yanjiao Wang, Jiaqi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanjiao WangSchool of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, 169 Changchun Road, Jilin 132012, China.
Jiaqi WangSchool of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, 169 Changchun Road, Jilin 132012, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an innovative metaheuristic algorithm, Genghis Khan Shark Optimization (GKSO) faces challenges, including a tendency towards local optima and poor convergence speed and accuracy. To mitigate these limitations, an improved Genghis Khan shark optimizer (IGKSO) is proposed in this paper. A population partitioning method based on cosine similarity and fitness is introduced, where individuals are strategically assigned to different evolutionary phases: Disadvantaged populations are responsible for the foraging stage. By contrast, advantaged populations dominate the moving stage. In the moving stage, the base vector is randomly selected from multiple candidates, which ensures the evolutionary direction of the population while maintaining its diversity. An adaptive step-size mechanism is introduced to avoid boundary overflow problems. A subspace method is employed to prevent diversity loss during foraging. Additionally, in the hunting stage, a novel opposition-based learning strategy is proposed to moderate the tendency of converging to suboptimal solutions. Furthermore, during the self-protection phase, a criterion for assessing the diversity of the whole population is employed to monitor and supplement diversity in real time. The results of the CEC2017 and CEC2019 benchmark test sets reveal that IGKSO exhibits substantial advantages over the GKSO algorithm and eight other high-performance algorithms in terms of convergence speed and accuracy.

Indexed as

Genghis Khan shark optimizernovel diversity assessment mechanismopposition-based learningparameter adaptation strategypopulation partitioning method

Identifiers

PMID42041500
PMCPMC13113091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.