ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Improved Genghis Khan Shark Optimization Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As an innovative metaheuristic algorithm, Genghis Khan Shark Optimization (GKSO) faces challenges, including a tendency towards local optima and poor convergence speed and accuracy. To mitigate these limitations, an improved Genghis Khan shark optimizer (IGKSO) is proposed in this paper. A population partitioning method based on cosine similarity and fitness is introduced, where individuals are strategically assigned to different evolutionary phases: Disadvantaged populations are responsible for the foraging stage. By contrast, advantaged populations dominate the moving stage. In the moving stage, the base vector is randomly selected from multiple candidates, which ensures the evolutionary direction of the population while maintaining its diversity. An adaptive step-size mechanism is introduced to avoid boundary overflow problems. A subspace method is employed to prevent diversity loss during foraging. Additionally, in the hunting stage, a novel opposition-based learning strategy is proposed to moderate the tendency of converging to suboptimal solutions. Furthermore, during the self-protection phase, a criterion for assessing the diversity of the whole population is employed to monitor and supplement diversity in real time. The results of the CEC2017 and CEC2019 benchmark test sets reveal that IGKSO exhibits substantial advantages over the GKSO algorithm and eight other high-performance algorithms in terms of convergence speed and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.