Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041486›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Biomimetic Design of Dental Restorative Materials: Conceptual Framework and Translational Challenges.

Tasneem Alluhaidan, Benjamin Hung, Masoumah Qaw, Isadora M Garcia, Mary Anne S Melo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tasneem AlluhaidanDental Biomedical Sciences Ph.D. Program, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5165-6307
Benjamin HungDepartment of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Masoumah QawDental Biomedical Sciences Ph.D. Program, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Isadora M GarciaDepartment of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Mary Anne S MeloDental Biomedical Sciences Ph.D. Program, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0007-2966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomimetics in dental restorative materials has gradually shifted from simply copying the appearance of natural teeth to better understanding how those tissues actually behave. Instead of focusing only on aesthetics, there is now more attention on how enamel and dentin function in real conditions, how they respond to stress, interact with their surroundings, and change over time. Because of this, newer materials are no longer just passive fillers; they are being designed to reflect aspects of natural tooth structure, composition, and behavior within the oral environment. This review brings together key ideas in this area, recent developments, and the challenges that remain. One issue that often comes up is how terms like bioinspired, biomimetic, and bioactive are used. They are sometimes treated as if they mean the same thing, but in practice, they point to different goals or levels of complexity in material design. For instance, some studies focus on creating more organized composite structures or mimicking natural mineralization processes, while others focus on antibacterial surfaces or peptide-based approaches that may support remineralization. There is also growing interest in materials that respond to environmental changes, such as shifts in pH or the early stages of wear. Even with promising laboratory results, these materials are not yet widely used in everyday clinical practice. Several issues continue to slow their adoption, including unclear terminology, limited availability of testing models that reflect real oral conditions, and a lack of long-term clinical data. Part of the challenge lies in the lack of consistent terminology, which can make it harder to compare findings across studies. Manufacturing challenges also remain, particularly when scaling up more complex systems. Moving forward, progress will depend on closer collaboration across disciplines, including materials science, oral biology, microbiology, and digital manufacturing. Such efforts will be important for developing restorative materials that behave more like natural tissues and perform reliably over time inside the mouth.

Indexed as

antibacterialbioactivebioinspiredbiomimeticdental compositesdental materialsion-releasing

Identifiers

PMID42041486
PMCPMC13113747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.