Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041471›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Biomimetic Strategies in Orthosis Design: A Scoping Review of Biological Abstraction and Functional Translation.

Tim Tchervonenko, Alexander Sauer, Thabata Alcântara Ferreira Ganga, Heike Beismann, Eduardo Keller Rorato, Míriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti, Maria Elizete Kunkel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tim TchervonenkoInstitute for Biomimetics, Westphalian University of Applied Sciences, 46397 Bocholt, Germany.
Alexander SauerInstitute for Biomimetics, Westphalian University of Applied Sciences, 46397 Bocholt, Germany.
Thabata Alcântara Ferreira Ganga3D Orthotics and Prosthetics Laboratory, Science and Technology Institute, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São José dos Campos 12247014, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6801-8985
Heike BeismannInstitute for Biomimetics, Westphalian University of Applied Sciences, 46397 Bocholt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6360-0471
Eduardo Keller Rorato3D Orthotics and Prosthetics Laboratory, Science and Technology Institute, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São José dos Campos 12247014, Brazil.
Míriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti3D Orthotics and Prosthetics Laboratory, Science and Technology Institute, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São José dos Campos 12247014, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1791-969X
Maria Elizete Kunkel3D Orthotics and Prosthetics Laboratory, Science and Technology Institute, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São José dos Campos 12247014, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1711-9289

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 443769/2023-0, 445657/2023-575 5, and 312022/2025-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthoses are widely used to support or modulate neuromuscular and skeletal function; however, their clinical effectiveness is often limited by discomfort, poor adaptability, and suboptimal human-device interaction. Biomimetics has emerged as a structured design paradigm capable of enhancing orthotic performance by systematically translating biological principles into engineering solutions. This scoping review examined biomimetic strategies in the development of orthoses. A structured search was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, and Scopus (2000-2025). Of 453 identified records, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Biomimetic orthosis research emerged predominantly after 2012, with increased activity after 2021. Human-based biological models, particularly muscle-tendon systems, predominated. Most studies relied on functional abstraction and were implemented using cable-driven or electromechanical actuation. None of the included studies explicitly referenced established biomimetics standards (e.g., ISO 18458), and descriptions of biological analysis, abstraction, and transfer were frequently incomplete. Experimental validation was generally limited to prototype-level testing, small sample sizes, and short-term evaluations, with no longitudinal or multicenter studies identified. These findings reveal a structural imbalance between conceptual biomimetic inspiration and structured methodological implementation. Based on this analysis, a structured biomimetic workflow is proposed to enhance traceability, reporting clarity, and clinical translation in the development of orthosis.

Indexed as

biological abstractionbiomimetic designorthosis development

Identifiers

PMID42041471
PMCPMC13113914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.