ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Biomimetic Strategies in Orthosis Design: A Scoping Review of Biological Abstraction and Functional Translation.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Orthoses are widely used to support or modulate neuromuscular and skeletal function; however, their clinical effectiveness is often limited by discomfort, poor adaptability, and suboptimal human-device interaction. Biomimetics has emerged as a structured design paradigm capable of enhancing orthotic performance by systematically translating biological principles into engineering solutions. This scoping review examined biomimetic strategies in the development of orthoses. A structured search was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, and Scopus (2000-2025). Of 453 identified records, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Biomimetic orthosis research emerged predominantly after 2012, with increased activity after 2021. Human-based biological models, particularly muscle-tendon systems, predominated. Most studies relied on functional abstraction and were implemented using cable-driven or electromechanical actuation. None of the included studies explicitly referenced established biomimetics standards (e.g., ISO 18458), and descriptions of biological analysis, abstraction, and transfer were frequently incomplete. Experimental validation was generally limited to prototype-level testing, small sample sizes, and short-term evaluations, with no longitudinal or multicenter studies identified. These findings reveal a structural imbalance between conceptual biomimetic inspiration and structured methodological implementation. Based on this analysis, a structured biomimetic workflow is proposed to enhance traceability, reporting clarity, and clinical translation in the development of orthosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.