Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041455›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Biomimetic Mechanism Transfer in Interior Environmental Comfort: A Systematic Mapping and Evidence-Stratified Framework.

Dilek Yasar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dilek YasarDepartment of Interior Architecture, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul 34295, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9578-6952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomimetic strategies have increasingly informed adaptive environmental systems; however, biomimetic mechanism transfer into interior environmental comfort remains unevenly operationalized and weakly evidence-stratified. Despite rapid post-2020 expansion of nature-inspired strategies, cross-domain translation across thermal comfort, indoor air quality (IAQ), visual comfort, and acoustic performance remains fragmented. This study addresses this gap by systematically mapping biomimetic mechanism transfer pathways within interior environmental systems, using biophilic strategies as a comparative baseline. A systematic mapping review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines to examine biomimetic mechanism transfer across interior environmental comfort domains. Studies were coded according to comfort domain, intervention scale, evidence type, and empirical strength. Results indicate three recurrent imbalances in the screened corpus: biophilic strategies dominate the literature (71.8%), intervention activity is concentrated at system scale and within multi-domain configurations, and acoustic bio-inspired optimisation is absent as a primary research domain. At the same time, the evidence base remains weakly stratified: only 10.3% of studies report statistically validated empirical findings, whereas 50.0% remain review-based or concept-led. To address these imbalances, the study proposes the Biomimetic Mechanism Transfer Mapping Framework (CPMF), a six-layer model linking biological logic, physical process activation, measurable IEQ outputs, empirical robustness, and implementation feasibility. The framework advances biomimetics by structuring mechanism translation into operational interior environmental performance systems.

Indexed as

biomimetic mechanism transferevidence-stratified analysisindoor environmental qualityperformance-based evaluationsystematic mapping review

Identifiers

PMID42041455
PMCPMC13113413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.