ReviewBiosensors2026
Analytical Performances of Polymer-Based Biosensors for Real Samples Application.
Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional Conductive Polymer Nanocomposite for Intelligent Pesticide Sensing: Trends, Challenges, and Future Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Foodborne Pathogen Detection from Sensing to Food Safety Systems: A Systematic Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Smart Hydrogel Architectures for Sensors: Narrative Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymer-based biosensors have evolved from passive supports into active functional elements that dictate analytical performance in complex real-world samples. This critical review with meta-trend analysis examines 96 original research articles published between 2015 and 2025, evaluating how four polymer classes (conductive polymers, redox-mediator polymers, hydrogels, and molecularly imprinted polymers) address matrix effects in food, beverage, environmental and clinical applications. Electrochemical detection dominates (79% of studies), with conductive polymers enabling low-potential operation that excludes electroactive interference. Hydrogels achieve superior precision (RSD below 3%) in protein-rich matrices through biocompatible microenvironments that preserve enzyme kinetics. Molecularly imprinted polymers provide unmatched stability in harsh environments for trace-level detection of heavy metals and toxins, though delayed response times from slow analyte diffusion persist. Critical evaluation exposes validation deficits: 91% of studies omit limits of quantification, while approximately one-third lack reproducibility (33%) and precision (30%). The multi-matrix challenge, maintaining calibration across different hostile environments, remains the primary barrier to commercial deployment. Advanced architectures, including nanocapsulation, hierarchical nanocomposites, and microneedle-integrated systems, offer pathways to overcome limitations in fouling resistance and operational stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.