ReviewPalliative medicine2026
Patients' dignity in palliative care: An integrative review of lived experiences and family perspectives across cultures.
Review in Palliative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDignity is a cornerstone of palliative care and represents a complex, multidimensional concept that warrants further conceptual integration.
aimTo synthesise evidence regarding patients' experiences of dignity in palliative care, with a particular emphasis on cultural influenceVs.
designAn integrative review was conducted following Whittemore and Knafl's framework. DATA SOURCES: Six databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest Sociological Abstracts, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to 28 February 2025. Targeted hand-searches of key journals were performed between March and June 2025.
resultsA total of 32 articles were included. Patients' understandings varied but dignity was commonly described as "being treated like a human being." Three themes were identified: (1) Inner experience, encompassing physical and psychological experiences, self-worth, resilience, and spirituality; (2) Relational and interactional dynamics, including personal autonomy and self-determination, and social relationships and support systems; and (3) Macro-structural determinants, comprising healthcare systems and delivery, as well as economic and socio-political circumstances. Cultural values shaped the perception and preservation of dignity. In collectivist societies, dignity was intricately linked to family, community, religion, and social harmony, whereas in individualist societies, dignity centred on autonomy and control over end-of-life decisions. Immigrants negotiated dignity through interactions between cultural values and healthcare expectations within host countries.
conclusionsThis review provides an integrated understanding of the factors shaping patients' perceptions of dignity in palliative care across cultures. The findings could usefully inform patient-centred and culturally sensitive palliative care practices that uphold dignity and promote well-being at the end of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.