ArticleEndocrine connections2026
De-escalation implementation in low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: a nationwide survey.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over the past decade, the management of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) has become increasingly individualized, with less aggressive approaches recommended for low-risk diseases. However, the real-world implementation of these recommendations remains limited. Objective: This study aims to assess real-world management patterns and therapeutic preferences regarding surgical extent, radioactive iodine (RAI) use, and thyrotropin (TSH) levels in low- and low-to-intermediate-risk PTC through a nationwide survey. Methods: A nationwide web-based survey was conducted among members of the Greek Endocrine Society (25% response rate) between November 2023 and April 2024. The questionnaire comprised demographic items, 12 clinical scenarios, and a final section exploring general reasons for nonadherence to clinical guidelines; this report focuses on eight scenarios related to low- and low-to-intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma. Results: For an 18 mm intrathyroidal low-risk PTC, 67.7% of respondents recommended total thyroidectomy, while 51.8% favored adjuvant RAI. When reclassified as low-to-intermediate risk, 92.5% endorsed RAI, often at higher doses (70 mCi), particularly among more experienced and those practicing in large cities. TSH suppression targets in case of excellent response varied: nearly half selected 0.5-2.0 μU/mL for low-risk PTC, but most favored tighter suppression (0.1-0.5 μU/mL) in low-to-intermediate-risk scenarios. Senior endocrinologists prefer traditional approaches. Barriers to guideline adherence included limited access to molecular and ultrasonography testing, a shortage of experienced surgeons outside major centers, and skepticism regarding guideline safety. Conclusion: Our findings underscore persistent practice variation driven by professional experience and local healthcare infrastructure, underscoring the need for targeted local implementation strategies, particularly outside major urban centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.