Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041080›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2026

The needle study: Machine learning as a new method for case-finding in celiac disease.

Chiara Maria Trovato, Monica Montuori, Maria Ludovica Costanzo, Giusy Russo, Cosimo Ruggiero, Danila Volpe, Francesca Ferretti, Antonella Diamanti, Carlo Ciliberto, Salvatore Oliva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The needle study: Machine learning as a new method for case-finding in celiac disease.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chiara Maria TrovatoGastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Monica MontuoriPediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Maternal and Child Health Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria Ludovica CostanzoDepartment of Surgery, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giusy RussoPediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Maternal and Child Health Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Cosimo RuggieroPediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Maternal and Child Health Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Danila VolpePediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Maternal and Child Health Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesca FerrettiGastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonella DiamantiGastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Carlo CilibertoUCL Centre for Artificial Intelligence, University College London, London, UK.
Salvatore OlivaPediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Maternal and Child Health Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2348-2308

Funding

Fondazione Celiachia 004_2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite a well-defined diagnostic work-up, uncertainties persist regarding celiac disease (CeD) detection strategies in the general population. Machine learning (ML) algorithms offer promise in aiding medical decision-making on clinical data. This study aimed to utilize ML prediction models to identify uncommon features indicating the necessity for CeD screening in children.

methodsThe discovery cohort comprised children with CeD exhibiting nonspecific clinical features, drawn from a single referral center, along with gender- and age-matched controls. Data collected included demographic details, symptoms, laboratory tests, and family history of CeD or other autoimmune diseases, excluding anti-transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (IgA) values. Various supervised ML models, utilizing input features to label CeD presence, were applied, with 73 features considered initially.

resultsWe collected data from 325 patients with CeD and 490 controls. A comprehensive evaluation using 10-fold cross-validation showed that a Ridge Classifier model achieved the best overall performance, with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.763 (±0.070), F1-score of 0.662 (±0.067), sensitivity of 0.652 (±0.110), and specificity of 0.689 (±0.081). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model identified a stable set of 40 predictive features, with noteworthy features including muscle pain, gastroesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms, fatigue, and specific family histories of autoimmune disease.

conclusionsML models, particularly the LASSO model, exhibited accuracy in identifying CeD in children with nonspecific clinical features. The identification of 40 uncommon features predictive of CeD diagnosis could support a more effective case-finding strategy, potentially enhancing CeD detection.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseMachine LearningAdolescentAlgorithmsCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsROC CurveSensitivity and Specificityartificial intelligencechildrendiagnosisuncommon feature

Identifiers

PMID42041080
PMCPMC13342765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.