ArticleClinical cardiology2026
Trend Analyses on Interventional Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation From 2016 to 2022: Insights From a Multicenter Hospital Database of Left Atrial Catheter Ablation Cases.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Technological Advances: Additional Considerations Regarding Temporal Trends in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent real-world data on the utilization of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) are scarce, as is information on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trends in interventional AF treatment. Aims of this study were to describe case characteristics and trends of CA management using a contemporary multicenter database.
methodsIn this retrospective, cross-sectional analysis, we investigated administrative data provided by 87 German hospitals from 01/01/2016 to 12/15/2022. Based on ICD-10 and OPS codes, inpatient cases with a main or secondary discharge diagnosis of AF who underwent CA were extracted. Incidence-rate ratios (IRR) for case numbers with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using negative binomial models. Trends based on regression analysis were adjusted for baseline variables.
resultsAnalyzing 29 144 CA cases (89.4% from high-volume centers), a significant increase in case numbers was observed throughout the study period (IRR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, p < 0.001). There was no sustained impact on the overall trend from the COVID-19 pandemic, but a temporary drop in case numbers in 2020. Utilization of transesophageal echocardiography (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.81-0.83, p < 0.001) and intensive care treatment declined (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.94, p < 0.001) and there was a trend toward a reduced incidence of pericardial tamponade. The ratio of cryoablations to radiofrequency CA case numbers increased from 0.29 ± 0.06 in 2016 to 0.50 ± 0.07 in 2022.
conclusionWe observed an increase in AF CA case numbers over the study period without a sustained influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on this long-term trend. Reported adaptations in CA management deserve further attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.