Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041064›Full record

SynthesisActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2026

Effectiveness of tinnitus retraining therapy in alleviating tinnitus symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhnnad A AlGhamdi, Ghaida Essa Alharbi, Danah Mohammed Saleh Aljahdali, Shahad Albeladi, Yousef Ismail Alaqsam, Moayyad Malas, Haya Alsubaie

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhnnad A AlGhamdiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ghaida Essa AlharbiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Danah Mohammed Saleh AljahdaliCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Shahad AlbeladiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Yousef Ismail AlaqsamKing Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Moayyad MalasDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Haya AlsubaieDepartment of Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City Hospital, Ministry of National Guard, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study systematically evaluated and analysed existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) in treating tinnitus at different follow-up periods and the factors that influence the choice of treatment. Databases reviewed: Medline, OpenAIRE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, Springer Nature Journals, Science Citation Index Expanded, and PubMed. Methods: Data were collected from multiple sources. Studies on adults with tinnitus, experiencing stable, bothersome, and chronic symptoms were included. Participants with significant comorbid conditions potentially influencing TRT outcomes and traumatic injuries were excluded. Results and discussion: A total of 18 articles were included in the qualitative assessment. The studies included encompassed various geographical locations and study settings, with a total of 1712 participants, of whom 1011 underwent TRT and 701 were in the comparison group who were receiving alternative treatments. Gender distribution among participants revealed 1097 males and 596 females. The analysis consistently demonstrated improvements in tinnitus severity and quality of life following TRT, as assessed by Tinnitus Handicap Index, Tinnitus Questionnaire, and Visual Analogue Scale. The meta-analysis revealed significant heterogeneity among studies; however, sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent results. Additionally, publication bias assessment indicated no systematic bias in effect sizes across studies. Conclusions: These findings suggest that TRT holds promise as an effective intervention for managing tinnitus. Further well-designed randomised controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and advance our understanding of TRT's efficacy in treating tinnitus.

Indexed as

TinnitusHumansTreatment Outcomehearing impairmenttinnitustinnitus handicap indextinnitus retraining therapy

Identifiers

PMID42041064
PMCPMC13113191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.