ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prognostic Prediction in Pulmonary Large Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionLarge Cell Carcinoma (LCC) is a rare, aggressive subtype of non-small cell lung cancer marked by rapid progression and limited treatment options. Prognostic assessment in this population has rarely been addressed, and conventional models based on American Joint Committee on Cancer staging often fail to capture the complex biological behavior of LCC. Machine learning approaches, however, have the potential to integrate diverse clinical data, thereby enhancing prognostic accuracy and supporting personalized treatment strategies.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database to develop and validate multiple machine learning-based prognostic models for Overall Survival (OS) in a cohort of 1,867 LCC patients. A rigorous analytical framework was implemented, incorporating feature selection via Lasso-Cox regression and the Boruta algorithm. Model performance was assessed using time-dependent Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration plots, decision curve analysis, and Brier scores. Advanced interpretability techniques including SHapley Additive exPlanations, partial dependence plots, and Restricted Cubic Splines (RCS) were applied to elucidate the prognostic impact of key features.ResultsAmong the models evaluated, the Random Survival Forest (RSF) demonstrated superior discriminatory power and robust calibration compared to traditional Cox regression and other machine learning methods. Specifically, the RSF model achieved AUC values of 0.858 (95% CI: 0.838-0.878) for 3-year OS prediction and 0.863 (95% CI: 0.84-0.886) for 5-year OS prediction in the training set. Key prognostic factors identified included tumor size, metastatic status, and treatment interventions, with RCS analysis revealing significant non-linear relationships between tumor size and survival outcomes.ConclusionsOur machine learning framework, especially the RSF algorithm, exhibits strong predictive performance for OS in LCC patients. The development of an accessible, web-based platform enhances clinical applicability by offering a novel, data-driven approach to personalized treatment planning and risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.