ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Transcriptome-Based Classification of Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Enhances Prognostic Modelling Accuracy of Overall Survival Following Adjuvant Treatment.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Landmark Series: Mutation-Based Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, patient outcomes after resection remain highly variable. Prognostic models are often inaccurate. Our study aimed to improve survival prediction by adding transcriptome-based classification to a validated prognostic model and applying it on a multicenter real-world cohort of fresh-frozen resection materials. RNA was sequenced if tumor cellularity was > 30%. The samples were classified using transcriptome-based classification. Survival differences between transcriptome-based subtypes were studied in patients treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. 25.6% of the patients received neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). Samples of 461 patients were collected, of which 118 samples underwent RNA sequencing. Of those, 39.0% had a basal-like subtype and 61.0% had a classical subtype. The basal-like subtype became dominant after NAT (63.3%, p = 0.004). Patients with a classical tumor survived longer than those with a basal-like tumor (median overall survival [OS]: 22.8 vs. 11.4 months; p < 0.001, in patients receiving adjuvant gemcitabine, and 10.7 vs. 5.4 months; p = 0.082, in patients without adjuvant treatment). In multivariable Cox regression, the classical subtype significantly associated with increased survival (hazard ratio = 0.38; p = 0.002) and adding transcriptome-based subtyping significantly improved the prognostic model (p = 0.002). Subtype and adjuvant treatment independently significantly associated with OS. Transcriptome-based subtyping significantly adds to clinical variables in survival prediction after surgery. The independent associations for subtype and adjuvant treatment with OS indicate that subtypes are prognostic, but not predictive for OS with adjuvant treatment. The provided prognostic information could potentially support treatment decisions and serve as stratification factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.