ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
The Cancer Immunotherapy Thromboembolism Assessment: A Novel Score for Predicting Thromboembolic Events in Melanoma Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibition.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Venous and arterial thromboembolic events (TEEs) represent a substantial threat for melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and have a significant impact on quality of life, therapy outcome, and survival. Existing risk assessment models for predicting TEE risk have been developed for other patient collectives and show poor performance in melanoma patients treated with ICI. In this cohort analysis, 358 AJCC stage III/IV melanoma patients treated with ICI between April 2013 and July 2024 at the University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg and the University Medical Center Mannheim were included. TEEs were recorded and classified as thrombosis including vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, stroke, or transient ischemic attack. Clinical and laboratory data were determined before the start and prospectively during the treatment. We identified elevated serum baseline D-Dimer (p = 0.0098) and elevated C-reactive protein (p = 0.0042) concentrations and measurable tumor burden (p = 0.0039) as main risk factors for the occurrence of TEE. For the final model, points were assigned for the Cancer Immunotherapy Thromboembolism Assessment (CITA) according to the impact of those variables using multiple logistic regression. The score was calculated for each patient. For the high-risk group, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 97.2%; sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% and 62%, respectively. The CITA risk score provides a simple and easily calculated risk assessment tool for stratifying melanoma patients based on their risk for TEE after ICI initiation, but prospective validation is needed before clinical use can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.