Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041003›Full record

ReviewPlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025

A survey on 3D reconstruction techniques in plant phenotyping: From classical methods to Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF), 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS), and beyond.

Jiajia Li, Xinda Qi, Seyed Hamidreza Nabaei, Meiqi Liu, Dong Chen, Qi Sun, Xin Zhang, Xunyuan Yin, Zhaojian Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiajia LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Xinda QiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Seyed Hamidreza NabaeiDepartment of Systems and Information Engineering & Link Lab, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Meiqi LiuDepartment of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Dong ChenDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA.
Qi SunTandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, USA.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA.
Xunyuan YinSchool of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Zhaojian LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant phenotyping plays a pivotal role in understanding plant traits and their interactions with the environment, making it crucial for advancing precision agriculture and crop improvement. 3D reconstruction technologies have emerged as powerful tools for capturing detailed plant morphology and structure, offering significant potential for accurate and automated phenotyping. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the 3D reconstruction techniques for plant phenotyping, covering classical reconstruction methods, emerging Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF), and the novel 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) approach. Classical methods, which often rely on high-resolution sensors, are widely adopted due to their simplicity and flexibility in representing plant structures. However, they face challenges such as data density, noise, and scalability. NeRF, a recent advancement, enables high-quality, photorealistic 3D reconstructions from sparse viewpoints, but its computational cost and applicability in outdoor environments remain areas of active research. The emerging 3DGS technique introduces a new paradigm in reconstructing plant structures by representing geometry through Gaussian primitives, offering potential benefits in both efficiency and scalability. We review the methodologies, applications, and performance of these approaches in plant phenotyping and discuss their respective strengths, limitations, and future prospects (https://github.com/JiajiaLi04/3D-Reconstruction-Plants). Through this review, we aim to provide insights into how these diverse 3D reconstruction techniques can be effectively leveraged for automated and high-throughput plant phenotyping, contributing to the next generation of agricultural technology.

Indexed as

3D Gaussian Splatting3D reconstructionAgricultureNeural radiance fieldsPlant phenotyping

Identifiers

PMID42041003
PMCPMC13109325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.