Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040985›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026

Strengthening suicide prevention: Evaluating a capacity building programme for community health workers in India.

Soumitra Pathare, Nikhil Jain, Deepa Pandit, Isha Lohumi, Laura Shields-Zeeman, Lakshmi Vijayakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Soumitra PathareCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-9024
Nikhil JainCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, India.
Deepa PanditCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, India.
Isha LohumiCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9550-5838
Laura Shields-ZeemanDepartment of Mental Health Prevention, Trimbos Institute, the Netherlands.
Lakshmi VijayakumarSneha Foundation Trust, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study evaluated a training programme adapted from the WHO mhGAP to enhance suicide prevention knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among 436 Community Health Workers (CHWs) in India. A pre-post intervention design assessed outcomes at four time points using a structured questionnaire, analysed via repeated-measures ANOVA. Mean knowledge scores increased from 6.32 ± 0.14 at baseline to 11.12 ± 0.12 post-training, then levelled off at 10.10 ± 0.14 and 10.10 ± 0.13 at 6 and 12 months, respectively; similarly, mean confidence scores increased from 4.96 ± 0.11 to 7.84 ± 0.11, remaining at 7.28 ± 0.10 and 7.44 ± 0.10 at the same time points. Mean attitude scores changed slightly from 41.00 ± 0.38 to 42.72 ± 0.43 over 12 months, indicating increased negative attitudes. Knowledge and confidence scores across time points were statistically significant (p < 0.05); however, this was not observed for attitude scores. Improvements were associated with CHW cadre and educational status. Post-training, CHWs demonstrated sustained improvements in knowledge and confidence for identifying, referring, and managing suicidal behaviour over 12 months, with those having lower baseline scores improving uniformly following the programme.

Indexed as

community health workerscommunity mental healthgatekeeper traininghealth systemsuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID42040985
PMCPMC13107075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.