In one paragraphArticle in ZooKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
5 authors.
Thomas KaltenbachMuséum cantonal des Sciences Naturelles, Département de zoologie, Palais de Rumine, Place Riponne 6, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland https://ror.org/019whta54.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8052-0388 Nikita J KlugeDepartment of Entomology, Biological Faculty, Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 7/9, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec Liberec Czech Republic https://ror.org/02jtk7k02.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9741-7790 Martin BláhaFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Zátiší 728/II, 389 01 Vodňany, Czech Republic Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic https://ror.org/0415vcw02.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-6604 Jiří PatokaDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague-Suchdol, Czech Republic Muséum cantonal des Sciences Naturelles, Département de zoologie, Palais de Rumine Lausanne Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-0563 Jean-Luc GattolliatMuséum cantonal des Sciences Naturelles, Département de zoologie, Palais de Rumine, Place Riponne 6, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland https://ror.org/019whta54.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-5083 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Mayflies collected in the central mountain range of New Guinea (Highland Papua Province) revealed a new genus of Baetidae,
Indexed as
COImayfliesMelanesianew speciesSiphliops extenso sp. nov.subimago
Identifiers
PMID42040981
PMCPMC13107134
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390