ArticleResearch square2026
Large-scale functional overlap between dorsal and ventral object-responsive networks.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The processes of recognizing objects and acting upon or with them have traditionally been attributed to computations associated with ventral and dorsal visual pathways, respectively. Accumulating evidence indicates that specific regions of the two pathways interact but the extent and strength of the whole-brain network connectivity remain to be evaluated. Here, in two experiments, we characterized the whole-brain network connections of object-selective seeds in each pathway using multiple analytic approaches with functional MRI data acquired while participants viewed objects. The results revealed substantial spatial overlap in connectivity in the networks generated from a dorsal and a ventral seed - with the greater similarity of these object networks within an individual than the similarity of each network separately across individuals. This overlap persisted for both tools and non-tools even after controlling for the shared variance between pathways. Notably, the dorsal pathway showed overall stronger and more widespread connectivity than the ventral pathway and was a stronger source of effective connectivity across the brain. Together, these findings reveal that dorsal and ventral pathways form highly overlapping and distributed networks in the service of object perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.