Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040938›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Increasing the Potential Effectiveness of Universal School Meals through Community- Engaged Implementation Mapping: A Qualitative Case Study.

Angel Smith, Divya Kulkarni, Sofia Dubrin-Meneses, Resa M Jones, Jonathan Deutsch, Jacob Kurtz, Irene Hong, Hillary Kane, Senbagam Virudachalam, Shiriki Kumanyika and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06579079 (A Hybrid Type III Implementation-effectiveness Trial to Improve Implementation and Participation of Universal School Meals), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06579079 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Hybrid Type III Implementation-effectiveness Trial to Improve Implementation and Participation of Universal School Meals (USM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTemple UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled1,000ConditionsFood Deprivation, Obesity, ChildhoodArmsImplementation Mapping, Waitlist Comparison - Implementation Mapping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Angel SmithBarnett College of Public Health, Temple University.
Divya KulkarniBarnett College of Public Health, Temple University.
Sofia Dubrin-MenesesBarnett College of Public Health, Temple University.
Resa M JonesBarnett College of Public Health, Temple University.
Jonathan DeutschDrexel University.
Jacob KurtzReinvestment Fund.
Irene HongFeeding Philly.
Hillary KaneUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Senbagam VirudachalamChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Shiriki KumanyikaUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Ross BrownsonWashington University in St. Louis.
Gabriella M McLoughlinBarnett College of Public Health, Temple University.

Funding

Using Implementation Mapping to Maximize Impact of School-Based Policies for Obesity PreventionK01HL166957 · NHLBI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Gabriella Mcloughlin · 2023 to 2026
$684k
Investigating Student-Level Outcomes of Equity-Focused Implementation Mapping in a Cluster Randomized Trial to enhance the impact of Universal School MealsR03HL178872 · NHLBI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MCLOUGHLIN, GABRIELLA · 2025 to 2025
$238k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL166957NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL178872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Universal School Meals (USM) serve as a first line of defense for students facing hunger in marginalized communities. Despite this, school meal uptake remains low across the district due to several barriers in the inner and outer school setting. Community- and school-led interventions and strategies are an underutilized approach for enhancing USM implementation and student uptake but may yield a more sustainable impact on addressing food insecurity. The aims of this study are to 1) engage in a structured implementation mapping process with a diverse array of school and district representatives grounded in implementation science and health equity frameworks, and 2) understand the key constraints and supports of implementation mapping from the lens of policy implementers and recipients. Methods: We recruited 4 schools (2 intervention, 2 waitlist) to engage in the mapping process. Meetings covered tasks 1-4: steps 1) needs assessment, 2) identify target objectives, 3) select strategies for enhancement, and 4) prepare an implementation plan over 4-5 planning meetings in partnership with school food service, students, parents, and teachers, and administrators of each school. Transcripts were deductively coded using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) and Getting to Equity (GTE) frameworks and inductively by the research team. Results: We engaged 19 participants across the 2 intervention schools (3 teachers, 2 food service, 2 parents, 2 administrators, 10 students). Data from the mapping meetings were primarily coded to Conclusion: Engaging school and district partners is an essential step for building lasting changes in the health of underrepresented communities. We successfully engaged a group of representatives to facilitate implementation mapping and implementation strategy development. This is one example of how community-partnered research can be leveraged to potentially facilitate change in school systems. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06579079, Registered on 07082024.

Indexed as

Childhood ObesityCommunity EngagementExploration Preparation Implementation SustainmentFood InsecurityGetting to EquityHealth EquityImplementation MappingNutritionPolicySchool Meals

Identifiers

PMID42040938
PMCPMC13105100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.