ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Mitochondrial Phylogenomics and Genome Evolution in Anura: Insights From Structure and Gene Order Rearrangements.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial genome ofZooKeys · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) has been proposed as a powerful molecular marker for phylogenetic reconstruction, evolutionary genomics, and population-level studies due to its maternal inheritance, relatively conserved structure, and elevated evolutionary rates. Anurans (frogs and toads), comprising 7693 species and ~90% of extant amphibian diversity, exhibit extensive mitogenome variability, yet the evolutionary significance of this structural diversity remains poorly understood. Using 277 anuran mitogenomes (spanning 35 families) and outgroup comparisons, phylogenomic reconstructions and gene order evolution analyses were conducted. Phylogenetic analyses resolved five major clades: Leiopelmatoidea (basal lineage), Discoglossoidea, Pipoidea, Pelobatoidea, and the crown group Neobatrachia. Archaeobatrachians emerged as a paraphyletic group, with sequential divergences of the first four clades. Neobatrachia was monophyletic, with Heleophrynidae and Sooglossidae occupying basal positions. Subsequent diversification revealed two major neobatrachian subclades: one uniting Calyptocephalellidae with Myobatrachoidea and Hyloidea, and another comprising Ranoidea, a topology consistent with recent phylogenomic studies but highlighting persistent conflicts within Hyloidea and Ranoidea. Divergence time estimation traced the origin of Anura to the Early-Late Triassic boundary, with major neobatrachian radiations occurring from the Late Cretaceous through the Early Neogene. CREx-based comparative analyses identified 58 distinct gene arrangement patterns, including lineage-specific synapomorphic rearrangements that were phylogenetically mapped. Our study provides a robust mitogenomic framework for Anura, reconciling deep phylogenetic discordance while revealing novel patterns of gene order evolution. These findings establish critical foundations for future investigation into the mechanisms driving mitogenomic structure diversification and its interplay with the evolutionary success of this ecologically vital vertebrate group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.