Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040828›Full record

ArticlePopulation research and policy review2025

Partisan Divergence in Fertility Change Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Florida.

Heather M Rackin, Christina M Gibson-Davis, Courtney E Williams, Dustin Hughes, Seunghwan Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population research and policy review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather M RackinDepartment of Sociology, Louisiana State University, 125 Stubbs Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9017-6637
Christina M Gibson-DavisSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, 228 Rubenstein Hall, Box 90312, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Courtney E WilliamsPopulation Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, 305 E. 23rd Street, Stop G1800 RLP 2.602, Austin, TX 78712-1699, USA.
Dustin HughesDepartment of Sociology, Western Washington University, Arntzen Hall 511, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA.
Seunghwan YooDepartment of Sociology, Louisiana State University, 122 Stubbs Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.

Funding

Training Program in Population StudiesT32HD007081 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Aprile Dawn Benner, Abigail Mae Weitzman · 1985 to 2026
$6.8M
Science CoreP2CHD065563 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Giovanna M Merli · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065563NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivated by political-based differences in pandemic perceptions, this study analyzed whether Republican- and Democratic-leaning counties exhibited differential fertility shifts, leading to a partisan fertility gap. As COVID-19 emerged, the political right dismissed the threat of the virus, while the political left emphasized it as a major crisis. These contrasting views may have led to diverging fertility responses between those living in Democratic- and Republican-leaning areas. Using county-level data from Florida, difference-in-difference models predicted quarterly change in fertility rates between 2018 and 2022. Models estimated the partisan fertility gap (e.g., Republican-Democratic difference in fertility rate changes relative to before the pandemic) as a function of 2020 Trump vote share. The partisan fertility gap widened during the pandemic's early months, as fertility in Republican-leaning counties declined less than in Democratic-leaning counties. This gap was only observed for White women and was robust to controlling on time-varying potential confounders (unemployment rate and racial composition changes). The partisan gap was short-lived, however. Results suggest that politically-charged contexts where would-be-parents lived may have affected pandemic-induced fertility shocks and demonstrates the need to understand fertility changes in the context of the broader political environment-a vital endeavor given record-low fertility and unprecedented political polarization in the United States.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicFertilityPolarizationPolitical identityVoting

Identifiers

PMID42040828
PMCPMC13105308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.