Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040819›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2026

Oncological Outcomes and Treatment Strategies for Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on the Oncological Resectability Classification.

Takashi Hamada, Akihiko Soyama, Hajime Matsushima, Ayaka Kinoshita, Kazushige Migita, Hajime Imamura, Shun Nakamura, Ayaka Satoh, Kohki Kurotaki, Tomohiko Adachi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Takashi HamadaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Akihiko SoyamaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Hajime MatsushimaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ayaka KinoshitaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kazushige MigitaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Hajime ImamuraDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Shun NakamuraDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ayaka SatohDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kohki KurotakiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tomohiko AdachiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ryu SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Hisamitsu MiyaakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Susumu EguchiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery and Transplantology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although hepatic resection is the most effective curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in selected patients, survival outcomes can vary significantly depending on tumor burden and biology. To provide a standardized framework, the oncological resectability classification introduced in 2023 stratifies patients into resectable (R), borderline resectable 1 (BR1), or borderline resectable 2 (BR2). However, the optimal management of patients with BR1 and BR2 in the era of novel systemic therapies remains uncertain. The present study evaluated the surgical validity and treatment strategies for patients with BR1 and BR2, based on this classification. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 184 patients who underwent initial hepatic resection for HCC at Nagasaki University Hospital between 2014 and 2024. Clinical variables, perioperative outcomes, the recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the overall survival (OS) were then compared across the 3 groups: R ( Results: The 5-year RFS rates were 43.9% for R, 39.3% for BR1, and 20.0% for BR2 ( Conclusions: BR1 patients, particularly those without vascular invasion, may achieve survival comparable to that of R. In contrast, BR2 patients generally show dismal outcomes with surgery alone, underscoring the necessity of systemic or multimodal approaches. Tailored strategies are essential for optimizing outcomes in patients with borderline resectable HCC.

Indexed as

Borderline resectableHepatic resectionHepatocellular carcinomaOncological resectability classificationPreoperative systemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID42040819
PMCPMC13108969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.