ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2026
A Method for Predictive Analysis of Platelet Supply.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the realm of medical management, effectively resolving the disparity between blood supply and demand is fundamental to the management of the platelet supply chain. Central to this is the accurate estimation and prediction of blood supply that is instrumental in conserving resources and minimizing expenses. However, time series analyses that rely on single models struggle to capture the intricacies of changing demand structures of blood and are susceptible to external events, which can lead to distorted forecasts. Moreover, the common pitfalls of conventional model evaluation methods, such as their short-term focus and one-sidedness, hinder the accurate assessment of a model's performance in the field of prediction of blood supply. Objective: This paper aims to construct a more comprehensive platelet clinical supply forecasting system by integrating the strengths of various prediction models and enhancing evaluation methodologies. Methods: This paper introduces a novel Decomposition-Combination Prediction Model that leverages X-13ARIMA-SEATS, where the individual components are modeled using ARIMA, TimeGPT, and SNAIVE methodologies. To assess the model's performance, evaluation metrics are meticulously constructed using a rolling window approach coupled with exponential decay weighting, allowing for a more nuanced evaluation through weighted MAPE. The efficacy and robustness of this approach are subsequently validated using platelet data from the Zhejiang Blood Center, providing a rigorous test of the method's practical applicability. Results: Empirical analysis demonstrates that the decomposition-combination model outperforms the individual ARIMA, Prophet, and TimeGPT models in terms of forecasting accuracy. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis reveals that while the decay factor influences the weighted MAPE results, the overall assessment of model performance remains robust. Conclusions: The decomposition-combination model adeptly captures the intrinsic characteristics of platelet series, thereby enhancing the model's forecasting accuracy. Concurrently, the rolling window-based weighted MAPE evaluation method effectively discerns the influence of external events and accurately assesses the forecast performance, thereby enhancing the model's generalization capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.