ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Perception of occupational therapy intervention in wheelchair seating among healthcare professionals in Bahrain.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proper wheelchair seating is essential for functional independence and quality of life. However, the role of Occupational Therapy (OT) in these interventions is often undervalued within multidisciplinary teams, particularly in regions like Bahrain where specific systemic barriers are not fully understood. Objective: To investigate the perceptions, awareness, and referral practices of Bahraini healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding OT in wheelchair seating and mobility (WSM). Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted among 110 licensed HCPs in Bahrain, primarily physical therapists (34.5%), nurses (27.3%), and medical doctors (18.2%). Data were collected on professional awareness, self-rated knowledge, referral history, and systemic barriers. Statistical analyses included Pearson's Chi-Square, Kruskal-Wallis H tests, and Binary Logistic Regression to identify predictors of clinical referrals. Results: While 80.9% of respondents were aware of the OT role, only 33.6% had ever referred a patient to OT for seating, revealing a profound "knowledge-practice gap". OT interventions were highly regarded, with 74.5% of participants viewing them as "very effective". Primary obstacles to referral included a lack of HCP awareness (78.2%), limited OT availability (71.8%), and high equipment costs (63.6%). Binary logistic regression identified formal training as the only significant independent predictor of referral behavior ( Conclusion: Despite a high level of professional regard for OT, systemic barriers and a critical lack of specialized training hinder its clinical integration in Bahrain. To optimize wheelchair service delivery, healthcare institutions must prioritize structured interprofessional education (IPE) and implement standardized digital referral pathways within electronic medical records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.