Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42040620›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

GCOA-Net: a graph-regularized cross-omics attention network for interpretable breast cancer molecular subtype classification.

Chen Li, Zhen Zhang, Chun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chen LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhen ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chun ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate intrinsic molecular subtyping is essential for precision management of breast cancer, yet multi-omics integration remains challenging due to high dimensionality, structured cross-omics dependencies, and the need for clinically interpretable and reliable predictions. Methods: We propose GCOA-Net, a graph-regularized cross-omics attention network that integrates transcriptomics, promoter-proximal DNA methylation, and miRNA expression. A biologically grounded heterogeneous graph connects CpG clusters to promoter-associated genes and miRNAs to their target genes. A relation-aware GNN encoder performs cross-omics message passing, while omics-specific and modality-level attention modules provide multi-level interpretability. We trained and evaluated models on TCGA-BRCA with repeated stratified five-fold cross-validation, benchmarking against classical early-fusion classifiers, integration frameworks, and deep multi-omics baselines. We additionally assessed ablations, subtype-specific explanations, robustness to missing modalities, calibration, and selective prediction. Results: GCOA-Net achieved the best overall performance (Acc = 0.912, Macro-F1 = 0.852, AUROC = 0.965) and improved calibration (ECE = 0.031) compared with baselines. Ablation analyses showed that biologically grounded cross-omics connectivity and graph regularization were key contributors, with degree-preserving edge randomization producing the largest performance drop. Attribution analyses identified subtype-consistent cross-omics biomarkers and compact explanatory subnetworks (e.g., ERBB2-centered regulation for HER2-enriched tumors). Under missing-modality scenarios, GCOA-Net degraded more gracefully and maintained better confidence reliability; selective prediction yielded a more favorable coverage-risk trade-off. Conclusion: Heterogeneous cross-omics graph modeling with graph regularization enables more accurate, robust, and interpretable breast cancer subtype classification, and provides a confidence-aware framework for molecular stratification that warrants further validation in independent multi-omics cohorts.

Indexed as

breast cancercalibrationgraph neural networksinterpretabilitymolecular subtypingmulti-omics integration

Identifiers

PMID42040620
PMCPMC13105865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.