ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Spontaneous uterine rupture with primary epigastric pain in the second trimester: a case report on diagnostic challenges and multidisciplinary management.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uterine rupture during the second trimester is an exceptionally rare but life-threatening obstetric complication, presenting significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Case summary: A 33-year-old woman, gravida 4, para 1, at 22 weeks and 3 days of gestation, was admitted due to a shortened cervical length. Four hours after admission, the patient developed acute, severe epigastric pain radiating to the back and shoulders. Her condition deteriorated with persistent hemoglobin decline. Abdominal and contrast-enhanced CT scans revealed perihepatic, perisplenic, and perienteric fluid accumulation, strongly suggesting intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Diagnostic paracentesis failed to yield non-coagulating blood. Following multidisciplinary consultation involving obstetrics, surgery, radiology, and anesthesiology, exploratory laparoscopy was performed to identify the bleeding site after obtaining informed consent, with conversion to laparotomy if necessary. Intraoperative findings revealed a full-thickness uterine rupture (4 cm × 1.5 cm) on the anterior wall. After further discussion with the family, cesarean delivery was performed, and the neonate was transferred to NICU. Postoperatively, the patient was admitted to ICU and received antibiotic therapy, fluid resuscitation, and thromboprophylaxis, achieving stable condition for discharge after 5 days. At the three-month postoperative follow-up, the patient recovered well. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and timely laparoscopic exploration for acute abdominal pain during the second trimester, particularly in patients with intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Early identification and prompt surgical intervention remain critical for improving outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.